Activity 3.3: Regenerative Agriculture Part 2

The authors Bestelmeyer, Brown, Polley, Fuhlendofr, and Brike are scientists in the field of grassland ecology who have decided, with a journalist named Ketcham as their objective, to develop these articles to direct the spotlight toward the analysis of Allan's holistic theme. Savory and address important environmental issues such as climate change and desertification.

These authors obtain credibility thanks to the scientific basis they present in their arguments. Here, Savory's claims are evaluated in great detail and it has been concluded that his claims are not exactly empirical evidence.

During the process, it can be noted that scientists are skeptical towards claims that are not supported by some foundation, more specifically, those solutions proposed to put an end to environmental problems such as desertification and therefore climate change. The purpose is to highlight that it is important not only to venture, but also to carefully analyze all the proposals.

In short, the perspective of these authors and scientists is attached to the rigor of science, skepticism towards statements without some argument, and ecological understanding. That is why they decided to advocate for approaches to the environmental issue that do present evidence or arguments to verify the validity and effectiveness of Allan Savory's holistic management theory.

-

In a search to obtain greater influence in their speeches towards a broader audience, publications have been carried out in official magazines and media with great popularity hoping to develop a better understanding and educate professionals and policymakers about the existing limitations of holistic management as advocated by Savory. The scientists that form part of this equation aim to provide more nuanced information on grassland management practices, encouraging them to base their decisions on scientific evidence and not on unfounded claims. The common objective of these articles is to be able to make a difference between grazing in multiple pastures, which can be considered a practice with great potential validity, and the claims made by Savory about the greening of the forest and the reversal of climate change.

-

Meral,T.(2024). Problems and Issues.

-

This article criticizes in great detail the statements of Allan Savory and his holistic management for the improvement of the environment.

Meral,T.(2024). Allan's Savopry Holistic Management Theory Falls Short on Science.

Below are the specific data and observations that contribute to the scientists' argument against Allan Savory's holistic method.

Meral,T.(2024). The Savory Method Can Not Green Deserts or Reverse Climate Change.

The research highlights the importance of investigating a proposal with potential so that it can have scientifically based foundations and more credibility.

​

Meral,T.(2024).Savory's Unsubstantiated Claims Should Not Be Confused With Multipack Grazing

-

5.1 Briske et al.(2014)

Briske states that Allan Savory has made statements that should not be mixed with the issue of multiple paddock grazing to discredit them since they lack supported and empirical information. That is why he advocates for a clear distinction, bringing to light the importance of grassland management evidence and the need for continued research to evaluate the true effectiveness of both techniques.

5.2 Briske et al. (2014).

Here, it is established that Savory's holistic method in the way it is promoted, in addition to career scientific evidence, has no way of making deserts green or reversing climate change on the planet and undermines the efforts already made to combat this problem. The authors aim to make the audience focus on sound scientific methods and policies that do have more tools such as combating desertification. They demonstrate the importance of decision-making based on grassland management and warn against trusting any source.

5.3 Ketcham (2017). 

Ketcham also criticizes Allan Savory for not having a scientific backing, criticizing Savory's rejection of scientific research which meant that his approach did not really provide any viable solutions for sustainable land management.

-

Scientists emphasize clarifying the concept of multiple-pasture grazing or, as it is also known, rotational grazing, which consists of moving livestock in a systematic way between different small pastures. This practice has as its main objective the imitation of natural grazing patterns, improving soil health to have better biodiversity. For example, ranchers can organize their livestock on a periodic basis and divide their land into small sections so that they can rotate livestock and allow plants and vegetation to recover and avoid overgrazing.

Allan Savory proposes these techniques as a holistic way to help the regeneration of degraded landscapes. However, he has been highly criticized by scientists, including Ketcham, since he maintains that the holistic theory does not have a scientific basis and advocates a comprehensive approach that considers ecological, social and ecological factors.

The problem grew when Savory claims that these same grazing techniques can also help combat other environmental problems such as desertification or climate change by increasing carbon sequestration in the soil, however, Briske states that empirical studies validating this evidence have show limited results.

These articles arise due to the need for evidence-based management, especially if it is management that involves planet Earth. They maintain that for this sector the incorporation of science is of utmost importance to verify its effectiveness and sustainability. As is the case of Briske by promoting the evaluation of results of different grazing strategies on the productivity of pastures.

The aim is to clarify all misconceptions about topics such as grazing in multiple jigs and the distinction between one and the other to avoid confusion among the audience. The authors seek to discredit multi-paddock grazing by highlighting the scientific basis for its ecological benefits.

The articles advocate making decisions based on evidence in order to achieve more sustainable results for planet Earth. Readers are encouraged to question the sources, the validity of radical claims like this case, and to demand empirical evidence.

                                                                      References:

Briske, D. D., Bestelmeyer, B. T., & Brown, J. R. (2014). Savory's unsubstantiated claims should not be confused with multipaddock grazing. Rangelands, 36(1), 39-42. BRISKE_et al_2014_Savory's_unsubstantiated_claim.pdf

Briske, D. D., Bestelmeyer, T., Brown, J. R., Fuhlendorf, S. D., & Polley, H. W. (2014). The Savory method can not green deserts or reverse climate change. Rangelands, 35(5), 72–74.  https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/4472/RANGELANDS-D-13-00044.pd

Ketcham, C. (2017). Allan Savory’s holistic management theory falls short on science. Sierra. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2017-2-march-april/feature/allan-savory-says-more-cows-land-will-reverse-climate-change

Meral,T.(2024).Savory's Unsubstantiated Claims Should Not Be Confused With Multipack Grazing

Meral,T.(2024). The Savory Method Can Not Green Deserts or Reverse Climate Change.

Meral,T.(2024). Allan's Savopry Holistic Management Theory Falls Short on Science.

Meral,T.(2024). Problems and Issues.